STUDENT EVALUATION AS AN IMPETUS FOR QUALITY TEACHING AND LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: THE EXPERIENCE OF BISHOP STUART UNIVERSITY

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Feb 23, 2022
https://doi.org/10.71064/spu.amjr.1.1.72
Download
pdf
Statistic
2020: Special Issue: African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research (AMJR)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Monica Karungi, Ronald Bahati

Abstract

In the context of sustained growth and diversification of Higher Education Systems, civil society is increasingly concerned about the quality of programmers offered to students. As a result, there is an increase in public assessments and international comparisons of Higher Education Institutions, not only within the higher education sector but in the general media (OECD, 2008). However, evaluation methods tend to overemphasize research and the use of research performance as a yardstick of an institution’s value. Although this is very paramount in academia, it has got insignificant contribution to the quality of graduates who precede from such breeding grounds. There is need to appreciate the fact that the quality of graduates is largely determined by the way they are taught thus calling for a rationalized intended approach to the evaluation of the quality of teaching and learning in higher education institutions (Kaneko, 2008). The current study investigated the quality of teaching in Bishop Stuart University in Uganda with the aim of encouraging practices that could enhance the quality of teaching and thereby checking the quality of graduates. The study adopted a cross sectional comparative study design using both quantitative and qualitative research approaches. This study was conducted at Bishop Stuart University (BSU), Mbarara in the Faculty of Education where a comparison of the teaching and learning process of students in two programme sessions of study (recess or distance learning and regular sessions) was carried out. Randomized samples of 362 out of a population of 1501 and 78 out of a population of 201 students were obtained from both the regular and recess sessions respectively for the quantitative data. An evaluation was done of the teaching and learning process in the two programme sessions in the classes taught by the same lecturers using the same instrument which had 9 items related to lecturers’ punctuality, attendance, mastery of subject content, teaching methods, enthusiasm and commitment, lecturers’ being dependable and approachable, respect and meaningful feedback. The findings thereof were mutually exclusive; it was found that the lecturers from students of the regular programme had very good scores whereas from students of recess or distance learning programme, the same lecturers had low scores. This finding compelled the researchers to find out why this was so. They thus conducted a Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and three Key Informants’ Interviews (KIIs) which revealed that the programme session conditions and terms of work affected the teaching and learning processes. It was concluded that under a given outlay of conditions, the same lecturers performed differently. It was thus recommended that using both qualitative and quantitative data approaches, there should be continuous student evaluations in ensuring effective teaching and learning, particularly for students in higher institutions of learning.
Keywords: Higher education institutions, student evaluation, teaching and learning.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Bahati, M. K. R. (2022). STUDENT EVALUATION AS AN IMPETUS FOR QUALITY TEACHING AND LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: THE EXPERIENCE OF BISHOP STUART UNIVERSITY. African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.71064/spu.amjr.1.1.72

References

  1. Adediwura, A. A., & Tayo, B. (2007). Perception of teachers’ knowledge, attitude and teaching skills as predictor of academic performance in Nigerian secondary schools. Educational Research and Review, 2(7) 165-171.
  2. Adunola, O. (2011). The impact of teachers’ teaching methods on the academic performance of primary school pupils in Ijebu-Ode local cut area of Ogun State. Ogun State, Nigeria: Ego Booster Books.
  3. Ayeni, A. J. (2011). Teachers professional development and quality assurance in Nigerian secondary schools.
  4. World Journal of Education, 1(2) 143-149.
  5. Azer, S. (2009). The qualities of a good teacher: how can they be acquired and sustained? Johannesburg: Royal Society of Medicine Press.
  6. Bruno, J. (2002). The geographical distribution of teacher absenteeism in large urban school district settings: Implications for school reform efforts aimed at promoting equity and excellence in education. Education Policy Analysis, 10(32), 1-3.
  7. Claessens, B. J.C., Eerde, W. V., Rutte, C. G., & Roe, R. A. (2007). A review of the time management literature.
  8. Personnel Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 36(2).
  9. Eggen, P. & Kauchak, D. (2002). Strategies for Teachers: Teaching Content and Thinking Skills (4th ed.). Needham Heights: M.A. Allyn and Bacon.
  10. European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education. (2008). Quality procedures in the European Higher Education Area and beyond–Second ENQA survey. Occasional paper 14, Helsinki.
  11. Griffiths, R. F. (2003). Time management in telework and other autonomous work environments, Dissertation Abstract International: Section B: The sciences and engineering, 64, 5B.
  12. Harvey, L., & Stensaker, B. (2007). Quality culture: Understandings, boundaries and linkages. Paper presented to the 29th EAIR FORUM, Innsbruck, Austria.
  13. Jacobs, K. D., & Kritsonis, W. A. (2007). An analysis of teacher and student absenteeism in urban schools: What the research says and recommendations for educational leaders. The Lamar University Journal of Student Research. Vol.16 (8) 7.
  14. Kaneko, M. (2008). Beyond the politics of competence, balancing the social claim and the core of higher education, presentation to the OECD-IMHE General Conference.
  15. Kreitner, R. & Kinicki, A. (2007). Organizational behaviour. Arizona: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
  16. Kuh, G. (2009). Higher education impact activities: What they are, why they matter. Washington D.C: AAC&U.
  17. Mariane, S. (2014). 5 research-based tips for providing students with meaningful feedback. New York: George
  18. Lucas Educational Foundation.
  19. Munyaradzi, G. (2013). Teaching methods and students’ academic performance; South Africa, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention. Vol. 2, Issue 9, 29-35.
  20. OECD. (2008). Tertiary education for the knowledge society. Vol. 1, Paris: OECD.
  21. Pitkoff, E. (1993). Teacher absenteeism: What administrators can do. NASSP Bulletin, 77 (551) 39-45.
  22. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA). (2006). Outcomes from institutional audit programme monitoring arrangements. United Kingdom.
  23. Scott, K., & McClellen, E. (1990). Gender differences in absenteeism. Public Personnel Management, 19(2):229- 253.
  24. Sidney (2012). Measuring the effect teacher absenteeism has on student achievement at an “urban but not too urban” title I elementary school. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, Vol. 2 No. 17.
  25. Stensaker, B. (2004). The transformation of organizational identities: Interpretations of policies concerning the quality of teaching and learning in Norwegian higher education. Enschede: Centre for Higher Education and Policy Studies (CHEPS).
  26. Tebabal, A., & Kahssay, G. (2011). The effects of student-centered approach in improving students’ graphical interpretation skills and conceptual understanding of kinematical motion. Lat. Am. J. Phy. Edu, 5(2) 374- 381.
  27. Vasudevan, H. (2013). The influence of teachers’ creativity, attitude and commitment on students’ proficiency of the English language in Kuala Lumpur. Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), Vol. 1, Issue 2, 12-19.
  28. Woods, R. C., & Montagno, R. V. (1997). Determining the negative effect of teacher attendance. Education, 118(2):307-317.
  29. Zafarullah S., Mumtaz, K., Uzma, M. P., Abida, S., & Humera, S. (2016). Teachers’ time management and the performance of students: A comparison of government and private schools of Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan. World Journal of Education, Vol. 6, 6: 42-50.