STUDENT INVOLVEMENT IN QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: PRACTICE AND EXPERIENCES AT THE UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY-AFRICA

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Margaret Mary Munyae, Peter Changilwa Kigwilu

Abstract

The success of Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs) is hinged on the quality of graduates they channel into the society. The growing concern about the declining employability of graduates of HEIs places a high threshold on the quality of education and training HEIs offer. Moreover, education regulatory bodies have enshrined quality assurance (QA) as a requirement for HEIs. Consequently, HEIs are increasingly embedding robust quality assurance systems in their processes for continuous institutional improvement. Despite the critical role stakeholders play in enhancing quality in HEIs, several challenges hinder the entrenchment of a culture of involving stakeholders in QA in most of these HEIs. The challenges include recruitment of stakeholders to take part in QA processes, stakeholder disinterest, inadequate QA competences in stakeholders, utilization of stakeholder input, and assessing the value of their involvement for institutional improvement. As a matter of fact, HEIs have a wide array of stakeholders ranging from internal stakeholders - students, employees, managers to external stakeholders - parents, employers regulatory bodies, government and the general public. The aforementioned have a stake in the performance of the HEIs hence their concern about quality. Without gainsaying, students comprise the largest stakeholders and are direct beneficiaries of educational institutions hence their involvement in QA is of paramount importance. Cognizant of this, United States International University-Africa (USIU-Africa) has, over the years, continuously engaged students, both current and alumni, at various levels, in her QA processes. Adopting a mixed methods research design, this study, rooted in the stakeholder theory, describes the engagement of students and alumni in USIU-Africa’s QA processes. Precisely, the paper interrogates six key issues: What QA processes are students involved in? What role(s) do students play in these QA processes? How are they involved in these QA processes? To what extent is students’ input utilized in improving quality? How adequately are students prepared to take part in QA processes? To what extent has student involvement in QA processes been effective? What challenges, if any, impede student involvement in QA? Document analyses and interviews with key informants are used to collect data for the study. Data is analysed and thematically interpreted in line with the research questions. Based on the findings, the study concludes that students are involved in QA processes, and students themselves nominate their representatives QA teams who are trained in a number of QA related topics. Although student involvement is viewed as valuable to HEIs, it is yet to be effective due to a myriad of challenges. Hence HEIs should enhance awareness creation by wide dissemination of QA activities, build the capacity of internal stakeholders, motivate students to embrace QA, and mainstream QA content in the common courses.
Keywords: Higher educational institutions, quality assurance, QA processes, stakeholders, student involvement.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Kigwilu, M. M. M. P. C. (2022). STUDENT INVOLVEMENT IN QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: PRACTICE AND EXPERIENCES AT THE UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY-AFRICA. African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.71064/spu.amjr.1.1.71

References

  1. African Union. (2007). Harmonization of higher education programmes in Africa: A strategy for the African Union.
  2. Summary report. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: African Union.
  3. Alaniska, H., Codina, E. A, Bohrer, J., Dearlove, R., Eriksson, S., Helle, E., et al. (2006). Student involvement in the processes of quality assurance agencies. Helsinki: European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.
  4. Altman, B. W., Schwegler, A. F., & Bunkowski, L. M. (2014). Beliefs regarding faculty participation in peer reviews of online courses. Internet Learning, 3(1).
  5. Amaral, A., & Magalhães, A. (2002). The emergent role of external stakeholders in European higher education governance. In A. Amaral, G. Jones & B. Karseth (Eds.) Governing higher education: national perspectives on institutional governance (pp.56-79). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  6. Brenner, S. N., & Cochran, P. (1991). The stakeholder theory of the firm: Implications for business and society theory and practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Association for Business and Society, Sundance, Utah.
  7. Brown, P., & Hesketh, A. (2004). The mismanagement of talent. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Dearlove, R. (2006). Student involvement in external quality assurance: Results of preliminary survey. In Student involvement in the processes of quality assurance agencies (pp. 32-40). Helsinki: European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA).
  9. Donaldson T. & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of corporation: Concepts, evidence and implication.
  10. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65.
  11. Elassy, N. (2013). A model of student involvement in the quality assurance system at institutional level. Quality Assurance in Education, 21(2), 162–198.
  12. European Commission. (2009). Enhancing quality in higher education: A Tempus survey. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  13. Evan, W. M., & Freeman, R. E. (1988). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T. Beauchamp, & N. Bowie (Eds.) Ethical theory and business (pp.75-93). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
  14. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
  15. Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and practice. Oxford University Press.
  16. Fontaine, C., Haarman, A., & Schmid, S. (2006). The Stakeholder Theory. Retrieved 15, April 2017, from http://www.edalys.fr/documents/Stakeholders%20theory.pdf
  17. Garison, S. H., & Borgia, D. (1999). Responding to stakeholders in the educational process and the impact on course design. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions, Special Issue Spring 1999.
  18. Gavra, A., Ivanova, L., Stråhlman, C., & Palomares, F.M.G. (2012). QUEST for quality for students: Going back to basics. Brussels: European Students’ Union.
  19. Hill, F. (1995). Managing service quality in higher education: The role of the student as primary consumer. Quality Assurance in Education, 3(3) 10-21.
  20. Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2) 131-154.
  21. Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections,
  22. interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education, 56, 303-324.
  23. Kigwilu, P. C., & Bwanali, F. (2016). Efficacy of life skills education in enhancing the employability of TVET graduates: The case of St. Theresa community college, Nairobi County. Africa Journal of Technical & Vocational Education and Training, 1(1) 31-40.
  24. Knight, P.T., & Yorke, M. (2002). Employability through the curriculum. Tertiary Education and Management, 8(4) 261-276.
  25. Kopaleishvili, N., & Lortkipanidze, T. (2013). Stakeholder survey analysis on quality assurance process in Georgia.
  26. Tbilisi: National Centre for Educational Quality Enhancement (NCEQE).
  27. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
  28. Lafer, G. (2004). What is “skill”? Training for discipline in the low-wage labour market. In C. Warhurst,I. Grugulis, & E. Keep (Eds.) The skills that matter. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  29. Lauder, H. (2001). Innovation, skill diffusion, and social exclusion. In P. Brown, A. Green, & H. Lauder (Eds.) High skills: Globalization, competitiveness and skill formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  30. Leisyte, L., Westerheijden, D. F., Epping, E., Faber, M., & de Weert, E. (2013). Stakeholders and quality assurance in higher education. Paper for 26th Annual CHER Conference. Lausanne: Centre for Higher Education Policies.
  31. Matlay, H. (2009). Entrepreneurship Education in the UK: A critical analysis of stakeholder involvement and expectations. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 16, 2, 355-368.
  32. McDowell, L., & Sambell, K. (1999). Fitness for purpose in the assessment of learning: Students as stakeholders.
  33. Quality in Higher Education, volume 5, Issue, DOI: 10.1080/1353832990050202
  34. Phillips, R. A. (2003). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  35. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, QAA. (2005). Outcomes from institutional audit: Student representation and feedback arrangements. Retrieved March 12, 2017 from www.qaa.ac.uk/reviews/institutionalAudit/outcomes/OutcomesStudentRep.asp
  36. QAA. (2009). Integrated quality and enhancement review: Student engagement. [Information bulletin 2010].
  37. Gloucester: The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
  38. QAA. (2006). Annual QAA report to the higher education funding council for England. Retrieved March 25, 2017 from www.qaa.ac.uk/aboutus/AnnualReports/default.asp
  39. Shah, M., & Nair, C. S. (2009). Using student voice to improve student satisfaction: Two Australian universities the same agenda. Journal of Institutional Research (South East Asia), 7(2) 43-55.
  40. Sternberg, E. (1997). The defects of stakeholder theory. Corporate Governance: An International Review 5(1) 3-10.
  41. Stoney, C., & Winstanley, D. (2001). Stakeholding: Confusion or utopia? Mapping the Conceptual Terrain. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 603-626.
  42. Sursock, A. (2011) Examining quality culture: Part I1-Processes, ownership and bureaucracy. Brussels: European University Association.
  43. UNESCO. (2006). Guidelines for quality provision in cross-border higher education. Paris: UNESCO.
  44. USIU-Africa. (2016a). Graduate exit survey report. Internal USIU-Africa report: Unpublished.
  45. USIU-Africa. (2016b). Criminal justice programme assessment report. Internal USIU-Africa report: Unpublished.
  46. USIU-Africa. (2016c). Master of Arts in Counselling Psychology programme assessment report. Internal USIU-
  47. Africa report: Unpublished.
  48. USIU-Africa. (2015). Hospitality and resource management alumni survey report. Internal USIU-Africa report: Unpublished.
  49. USIU-Africa (2014) Doctoral culture survey report. Internal USIU-Africa report: Unpublished.
  50. USIU-Africa. (2013). Information Science and Technology programme review report. Internal USIU-Africa report: Unpublished.
  51. Varonism, E. M. (2014). Most courses are not born digital: An overview of the quality matters peer review process for online course design. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 31(4) 217–229.
  52. Werum, R. (2003). Trinidad and Tobago’s post-secondary education system: Bottlenecks in technical training programs. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
  53. Wison, L. (2008). Great American schools: The power of culture and passion. Education Digest, 73(6), 13-18.