OBSTACLES TO SUCCESSFUL UPTAKE OF OPEN DISTANCE AND E-LEARNING (ODEL) PROGRAMMES: A CASE OF KENYATTA UNIVERSITY, KENYA

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Feb 23, 2022
https://doi.org/10.71064/spu.amjr.1.1.66
Download
pdf
Statistic
2020: Special Issue: African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research (AMJR)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Elizabeth Mwaniki, Antony Ireri, Fatuma Chege, Mukirae Njihia

Abstract

Demand for higher education in Kenya has continued to rise over the years thereby outstripping the available supply in the conventional face-to-face programmes. This can be attributed to two major factors. First, are the reforms in the basic education sector, for example, the Free Primary Education and the Free Day Secondary Education which have enhanced enrolment and completion rates in these lower levels. Second, is the changing labour market trend which requires workers to be re-tooled during their working life. Universities therefore have to cope with demand for education from young secondary school graduates as well as older citizens who are already working. To meet this high demand for higher education as well as provide flexible education for the working class, universities in Kenya must leverage the potential of ICT in teaching and learning. Despite moves by most universities in Kenya more than a decade ago to embrace Open and distance learning (ODL) programmes that utilise modern ICT technologies in teaching and learning, enrolment in these programmes still remain low compared to the traditional face-to-face platform of delivery. For example, in 2016, Kenyatta University, which had a total student population of about 70,000 had only about 6,000 (8.5%) enrolled in the Digital School of Virtual and Open Learning. The objective of this study is to establish the obstacles that hinder the success of Open and Distance Learning programmes at Kenyatta University. The study employed a sequential mixed methods design that allowed collection of both quantitative and qualitative data. Data was collected from a sample of 207 students through a questionnaire while Key Informant Interviews were conducted with 5 members of staff directly involved either in the management of the ODeL programme or in on-line teaching. The study established that success of the ODeL programme was hampered by technical, instructional, institutional and personal challenges. Key technical challenges faced by both students and staff are insufficient exposure to computers and ICT technology, lack of finances to buy ICT gadgets and lack of internet connectivity. Key institutional challenges facing the programme are delayed delivery of study materials and inadequate learner support services. With regard to instructional challenges, inadequate academic support due to lecturers failing to facilitate units on-line and poorly designed course materials were the key ones. Lastly, learners in the programme faced individual challenges such as financial constraints, insufficient study time, conflict between study and family/work balance. The study recommends the strengthening of learner support mechanisms to address the institutional, instructional and individual challenges faced by learners in the ODeL programme.
Keywords: Blended learning, distance learning, e-learning, higher education, ICT, ODel, open learning.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Njihia, E. M. A. I. F. C. M. (2022). OBSTACLES TO SUCCESSFUL UPTAKE OF OPEN DISTANCE AND E-LEARNING (ODEL) PROGRAMMES: A CASE OF KENYATTA UNIVERSITY, KENYA. African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.71064/spu.amjr.1.1.66

References

  1. Algahtani, A. F. (2011). Evaluating the effectiveness of the e-learning experience in some universities in Saudi Arabia from male students’ perceptions. Durham theses, Durham University.
  2. Alfonso, G. J. (2012, August). UP Open University: Thoughts about openness in a digitized world [PowerPoint slides]. Presentation at the UPOU Roundtable Discussion, UPOU Oblation Hall, Los Banos, Laguna.
  3. Almosa, A. (2001). Use of computer in education (2nd Edition), Riyadh: Future Education Library.
  4. Almosa, A., & Almubarak, A. (2005). E-learning foundations and applications. Saudi Arabia: Riyadh.
  5. Arinto, P. B. (2016). Issues and challenges in open and distance e-Learning: Perspectives from the Philippines.
  6. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 162-180.
  7. Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2014). The Role of e-learning, the advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Education and Research, Vol. 2(12), 2014.
  8. Anderson, A. (2008). Seven major challenges for e-learning in developing countries: Case study eBIT, Sri Lanka,
  9. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, Vol 4, Issue 3.
  10. Bates, T. (2008). “Transforming distance education through new technologies”. In T. Evans, M. Haughey & D. Murphy (Eds.) International handbook of distance education (pp. 217-236). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
  11. Calvert, J. (2005). Distance education at the crossroads. Distance Education, 26 (2) 227-238.
  12. Harrell, I. L., & Bower, B. L. (2011). Student characteristics that predict persistence in community college online courses. American Journal of Distance Education 25(3):178-191. DOI: 10.1080/08923647.2011.590107
  13. Larsen, J. E. (2006). The role of the humanities in the bologna idea of a university: Learning from the American model. Retrieved May 9, 2018, from http://www.sc.ehu.es/sfwseec/reec/reec12/reec1211.pdf
  14. CUE. (2017). List of Accredited Universities. Retrieved April 15, 2018, from http://www.cue.or.ke/images/phocadownload/Accredited_Universities_in_Kenya_November_2017.pdf
  15. Commonwealth of Learning. (2004). Planning and Implementing Open and Distance Learning Systems: A Handbook for Decision Makers. Vancouver: CoL.
  16. Dodo, O. (2013). An analysis of challenges faced by students learning in virtual and open distance learning system: A case of Bindura University of Science Education (BUSE). Journal of Global Peace and Conflict, 1(1) 28-40.
  17. DSVOL. (2017) DSVOL Brochure, Kenyatta University. Retrieved April 10, 2017, from http://www.ku.ac.ke/dsvol/images/2017/Digital_School_Updated_Brochure_2017.pdf
  18. Garrison, R. (2009). Implications of online learning for the conceptual development and practice of distance education. Journal of Distance Education/Revue de L’ education a Distance, 23 (2), 93-104.
  19. Garrison, R. (2000). Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century: A shift from structural to transactional issues. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 1(1). Retrieved November 20, 2016 from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2/22
  20. Haughey, M., Evans, T., & Murphy, D. (2008). “Introduction: From correspondence to virtual learning environments”. In T. Evans, M. Haughey, & D. Murphy (Eds.) International handbook of distance education (pp. 1-24). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
  21. Holmes, B., & Gardner, J. (2006). E-Learning: Concepts and practice. London: SAGE Publications.
  22. Illara, S. (2006). Preparing teachers and schools for the 21st century in the integration of information and communication technology: Review of recent report in the US. Interactive Educational Multimedia, 12, 44- 61.
  23. Kenan, T., & Pislaru, C. (2012). Challenges related to implementation of learning in higher education institutions in Libya. Paper presented in Computing Engineering Research Conference, University of Huddersfield, IK.
  24. KUCCPS. (2016). Release of the 2016/2017 Placement Results, Retrieved April 10, 2017, from http://kuccps.net/?q=content/release-20162017-placement-results
  25. King, B. (2012). Distance education and dual-mode universities: An Australian perspective, Open Learning. The Journal of Open, Distance and E learning, 27(1) 9-22.
  26. Mansour, B. (2006). Challenges and solutions in offering distance education programs: A case study of an HRD program. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 11(3) 33-39.
  27. Minnaar, A. (2013). Challenges for successful planning of open and distance learning (ODEL): A template analysis.
  28. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3) 81-108.
  29. Musingafi, M., Mapuranga, B., Chiwanza, K., & Zebron, S. (2015). Challenges for open and distance learning (ODL) students: Experiences from students of the Zimbabwe Open University. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(18) 1-5.
  30. Nyandara, Z. (2012). Challenges and opportunities of technology based instruction in open and distance learning: A comparative study of Tanzania and China. In proceedings and report of the 5th UbuntuNet Alliance Annual Conference, 130-145. Retrieved April 10, 2017, from https://www.ubuntunet.net/sites/default/files/nyandaraz.pdf
  31. Renes, S., & Strange, A. (2011). Using Technology to Enhance Higher Education. Innovative Higher Education, 36(3) 203-213.
  32. Subotzky, G., & Prinsloo, P. (2011). Turning the tide: A socio-critical model and framework for improving student success in open distance learning at the University of South Africa. Distance Education, 32(2) 177-193.
  33. Tait, A. (2010). “Foreword”. In M. F. Cleveland-Innes & D. R. Garrison (Eds.) An introduction to distance education: Understanding teaching and learning in a new era (pp. ix-xi). New York: Routledge.
  34. Zeitoun, H. (2008). E-learning: Concept, issues, application, evaluation. Riyadh: Dar Alsolateah Publication.
  35. UNESCO. (2000). Analytical survey, distance education for the information society, policies, pedagogy and professional development. UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education. Moscow: UNESCO/IITE.
  36. UNESCO. (2002). Open and Distance Learning: Trends, policies and strategy considerations. Paris: UNESCO.