A Uses and Gratification Perspective on Social Network Sites among Private University Students in Kenya

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Feb 23, 2022
https://doi.org/10.71064/spu.amjr.4.2.62
Download
pdf
Statistic
Vol. 4 No. 2 (2019): African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research (AMJR)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Wilson Musyoka, Wanjugu Wachira, Antony Odek, Vincent Ochieng, William Sang, Gladys Muasya

Abstract

Despite a number of studies exploring the uses and gratifications of social network sites (SNS) in Sub-Saharan Africa, few seek to know which gratifications lead to high dependence in the use of a particular SNS and how it enhances the sense of social presence among students. Informed by uses and gratification theory and social presence theory, this paper sought to fill this gap. The researchers used a stratified random sample of 489 students from a private university in Kenya. These students filled a survey between February and May 2018 that focused on the types of social media sites students sought and their gratifications. The data collected was analysed using content analysis, hierarchical and logistic regression. Results showed that students sought various gratifications from SNS. First, they sought SNS that enabled them to communicate, interact, socialize and connect with friends, and family; secondly, to get updates and trending news; furthermore, students sought SNS to access new technologies and innovations. Other gratifications sought were: to transact business; carry out work-related duties; enhance learning; entertain, and enjoy the attributes of the SNS. Purposive value influenced dependence on Facebook and WhatsApp, Purposive value (information) and entertainment influenced dependency on Google, while entertainment influenced dependency on YouTube. There were positive relationships between social presence with purposive value, self-discovery, and entertainment. Some practical implications include: first, the universities should channel the gratifications that students seek in social media to enhance learning activities. Secondly, YouTube should be incorporated into learning and teaching activities.
Keywords: University students, social network sites, uses and gratifications, social presence theory

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Muasya, W. M. W. W. A. O. V. O. W. S. G. (2022). A Uses and Gratification Perspective on Social Network Sites among Private University Students in Kenya. African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.71064/spu.amjr.4.2.62

References

  1. Appiah, M. K. (2016). Influence of WhatsApp on study habit of university students
  2. in Ghana. International Journal of Research in Economics and Social Sciences, 6(3), 280- 292.
  3. Asemah, E. S., & Edegoh, L. O. N. (2013). Influence of social media on the
  4. academic performance of the undergraduate students of Kogi State University, Anyigba, Nigeria. Journal of Research and Contemporary Issues, 7.
  5. Bake https://sokodirectory.com/2018/02/number-kenyans-social-media- platforms- increases- bake/
  6. Balakrishnan, J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017). Social media addiction: What is the role of content in YouTube? Journal of behavioral addictions, 6(3), 364-377.
  7. Bloggers Association of Kenya. (2017). State of the internet in Kenya 2019. https://www.ifree.co.ke/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/State-of-the-Internet-in-Kenya- report-2017.pdf
  8. Blumler, J. G., & Katz, E. (Eds.). (1974). The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
  9. Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history,
  10. and scholarship. Journal of Computer‐mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
  11. Curran, K., Morrison, S., & Mc Cauley, S. (2012). Google+ vs Facebook: The Comparison. TELKOMNIKA (Telecommunication Computing Electronics andControl), 10(2), 379-388.
  12. Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi, R. P., & Pearo, L. K. (2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network-and small-group-based virtual
  13. communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 241-263.
  14. Froget, J. R. L., Baghestan, A. G., & Asfaranjan, Y. S. (2013). A uses and gratification perspective on social media usage and online marketing. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 15(1), 134-145.
  15. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2004). Consumer trust in B2C e-commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-products and e-services. Omega, 32(6), 407-424.
  16. Gooch, D., & Watts, L. (2015). The impact of social presence on feelings ofcloseness in personal relationships. Interacting with Computers, 27(6), 661-674.
  17. Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2/3), 147-166.
  18. Hanson, G., & Haridakis, P. (2008). YouTube users watching and sharing the news: A uses and gratifications approach. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 11(3).
  19. Hwang, H. S., & Lombard, M. (2006). Understanding instant messaging: Gratifications and social presence. Proceedings of PRESENCE 2006, 50-56.
  20. Jamie (2018, June 1) 60+ Social network Sites you need to know about in 2018. https://makeawebsitehub.com/social-media-sites/
  21. Kircaburun, K., Alhabash, S., Tosuntaş, Ş. B., & Griffiths, M. D. (2018). Uses and gratifications
  22. of problematic social media Use among university students: a simultaneous examination of the big five of personality traits, social media platforms, and Social Media use motives. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 1- 23.
  23. Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179-187.
  24. Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509-523.
  25. Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2011). Online social network and addiction—a review of the psychological literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(9), 3528-3552.
  26. Liu, I. L., Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2010). Understanding Twitter usage: What drive people continue to tweet. Pacis, 92, 928-939.
  27. Lowenthal, P. R. (2009). The Evolution and influence of social presence theory on online learning. Social computing: Concepts, Methodologies, tools, and applications, 113.
  28. Manasijević, D., Živković, D., Arsić, S., & Milošević, I. (2016). Exploring students’ purposes of usage and educational usage of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 441- 450.
  29. Nyland, R. S. (2007). The gratification niches of Internet social network, e-mail, and face- to- face communication.
  30. Sampath, H., Kalyani, S., Soohinda, G., & Dutta, S. (2017). Patterns, attitudes, and dependence toward WhatsApp among college students. Journal of Mental Health and Human Behaviour, 22(2), 110.
  31. Sendurur, P., Sendurur, E., & Yilmaz, R. (2015). Examination of the social network sites usage patterns of pre-service teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 188-194.
  32. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons.
  33. Soko Directory. (2018, February 15).Number of Kenyans on social media platforms increases – https://sokodirectory.com/2018/02/number-kenyans-social-media-platforms-increases- bake/
  34. Xu, C., Ryan, S., Prybutok, V., & Wen, C. (2012). It is not for fun: An examination of social network site usage. Information & Management, 49(5), 210-217.
  35. Stafford, T. F., Stafford, M. R., & Schkade, L. L. (2004). Determining uses and gratifications for the Internet. Decision sciences, 35(2), 259-288.