Ephesians 5: 21-33 and Gender Equity: Towards a Mutual, Egalitarian and Gender-Balanced Church Leadership

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Kabiro Wa Gatumu

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to assess some selected readings of Ephesians 5:21-33 household code, which favours male authority and control over women. Such interpretations have been informed by the Graeco-Roman and Jewish male-dominated household management but they cause exclusion and alienation of women from church leadership. Theses interpretations are accepted in the African context, wherein patriarchal leanings are by the least undeniable. The African patriarchal setting assents to male supremacy and female inferiority, yet women are recognized as household managers. In contrast, Ephesians 5:21-33 transforms Graeco-Roman and Jewish household management by endorsing mutual submission between husband and wife based on love and respect. The text does not exclude women from church leadership but it rather reveals that Christian gender relations must be distinct from those of non-Christians. Men and women must lead so as to unfold God’s redeeming activity through Jesus Christ.
Key Words: Gender Equity, Mutual, Egalitarian, Gender-Balanced leadership, Household Codes, Household Management, Church Leadership.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Wa Gatumu, K. (2022). Ephesians 5: 21-33 and Gender Equity: Towards a Mutual, Egalitarian and Gender-Balanced Church Leadership. African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.71064/spu.amjr.4.2.59

References

  1. Achiro, M. (2014). “Submission: An Engendered Reading of Ephesians 5: 21-33”. School of Mission and Theology, Stavanger, Norway: Unpublished Masters Thesis.
  2. Alföldy, G. (1988). The Social History of Rome (Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988).
  3. Amadi-Azuogu, A. C. (2007).The Politics of Power & the Ordination of Women: Gender and Power in the New Testament and the Church Today. Maitland, Florida:Xulon Press.
  4. Ande, T. (2010). Leadership and Authority: Bula Matari and Life-Community Ecclesiology in Congo. Oxford: Regnum Books.
  5. Bauman, R. A. (1994). Women and Politics in Ancient Rome. London: Routledge, 1994.
  6. Ben-Menahem, H. (2005). “Controversy and Dialogue in the Jewish Tradition: An Interpretative Essay” inHanina Ben-Menahem, Neil S. Hecht and Shai Wosner,Controversy and Dialogue in the Jewish Tradition: A Reader (pp. 1- 42).London & New York: Routledge.
  7. Berry, V. J. (2016). Why Historical Phenomena Instigates Resistance to Female Clergy. np: Lulu.com.
  8. Bevir, M.(ed.). (2010). Encyclopedia of Political Theory / 1, [A - E]. Los Angeles: SAGE.
  9. Bird, J. G. (2013). Abuse, Power and Fearful Obedience: Reconsidering 1 Peter's Commands to Wives. London & New York: Bloomsbury T & T Clark.
  10. Blomberg, C. L. (n.d.). “Woman.” in Baker's Evangelical Dictionary of Biblical Theology Online. Retrieved from https://www.biblestudytools.com/dictionaries/bakers-
  11. evangelical-dictionary/woman.html.
  12. Bryan, C.(2014). Listening to the Bible: The Art of Faithful Biblical Interpretation. New York: Oxford University Press.
  13. Burns, E. M. (1986). World Civilization: Their history and Their Culture, (New York & London: Norton.
  14. Chadwick, H. (Tr.). (1980). Origen: ContraCelsum– With an Introduction and Notes.
  15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Chakkuvarackal, T. J. (n.d.). “Woman-Power in the Canonical Gospels: A Paradigm for the Modern Patriarchal Societies”.Retrieved from http://www.religion-
  17. online.org/showarticle.asp?title=2448 on 21.11.2018.
  18. Clarke, A. D. (2008). A Pauline Theology of Church Leadership.London/ New York: T & T Clark.
  19. Complete Works of Plutarch (2013)..n.p.: Delphi Ancient Classics. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.ke/books?redir_esc=y&id=dmYbAgAAQBAJ&q=Crassus#v
  20. =snippet&q=Crassus&f=false on 06.12.2018.
  21. Coontz, S. (2005). MarriageA History: From Obedience to Intimacy or How Love Conquered Marriage. New York: Viking.
  22. Darden, L. S. C. (2015). “A Womanist Postcolonial Reading of the Samaritan Woman at the Well and Mary Magdalene at the Tomb”, in Mitzi J Smith (ed.), I Found God in Me: A Womanist Biblical Hermeneutics Reader (pp. 183-202). Eugene, Oregon: Cascade Books.
  23. Davidson. I. J. &Dowley. T. (2005).The birth of the Church: From Jesus to Constantine, A.D.
  24. -312.Oxford: Monarch Books.
  25. Dube, M. W.(2012). “The Scramble for Africa as the Biblical Scramble for Post-Colonial Perspective.” in M. W Dube, A. M Mbuvi & D.Mbuyasengo (eds.), Postcolonial Perspectives in African Biblical Interpretations (pp. 1-28). Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2012.
  26. Finlan, S. (2013).The Family Metaphor in Jesus' Teaching: Gospel Imagery and Application.
  27. (Eugene, Oregon: Cascade Books.
  28. Friberg, (n.d.). Analytical Greek Lexicon, in Bibleworks Software, Version 10.0.4.114
  29. George, E. (2011). A woman's High Calling. Eugene, Oregon: Harvest House.
  30. Gingrich,,(n.d.). Greek New Testament Lexicon, in Bibleworks Software, Version 10.0.4.114
  31. Girard, M. (2000). “Love as Subjection, the Christian Ideal for Husband ands and Wives: A
  32. Structuralist Reading of Ephesians 5: 21-33.” in G rald Caron (et al), Women also Journeyed with Him: Feminist Perspectives on the Bible (pp. 125-136). Collegeville, Minnesota: Liturgical Press
  33. Green, J. B.(2003). “Hermeneutical Approaches to the New Testament Tradition” in J. D. G. Dunn & J. W. Rogerson (eds.). Eerdmans Commentary of the Bible (pp. 971-988). Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.
  34. Groothuis, R. M. (2005). “Equal in Being, Unequal in Role.” in Ronald W. Pierce &Rebecca Merrill Groothuis Discovering Biblical Equality: Complementarity without Hierarchy (pp.301-354).Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity Press.
  35. Groothuis, R. M. (1997). Good News for Women: A Biblical Picture of Gender Equality.
  36. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books.
  37. Hamedi, A.(2014). “The Concept of Justice in Greek Philosophy (Plato and Aristotle).” in
  38. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences (pp. 1163-1167). Vol. 5, No. 27.
  39. Heaster, D. (n.d.). “Debating Bible Basics.” Retrieved from http://www.aletheiacollege.net/dbb/10-1women_in_the_church.htm, on 01.12.2016.
  40. Hittinger, J. (2013). “Plato and Aristotle on the Family and the Polis.” in The Saint Anselm Journal, 8.2, (pp. 1-22).Retrieved from http://www.anselm.edu/Documents/Institute%20for%20Saint%20Anselm%20Studies/
  41. spring%202013/Hittinger,%20The%20family%20and%20the%20polis.pdf on 09.01.2017.
  42. Hsia. R. P.-C, (1988). The German People and the Reformation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  43. Hutchison, E. D. (2011). Dimensions of Human Behavior: Person and Environment.
  44. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
  45. Johnson, E. E. (2012). “Ephesians.” in Carol A Newsom; Sharon H Ringe and Jacqueline E Lapsley (eds.), Women's Bible Commentary (pp. 576-580).Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster John Knox Press.
  46. Johnson, M. S. (2005). Women in Christianity.New Delhi: Mittal Publications.
  47. Jackson, T. R. (2016).New Creation in Paul's Letters: A Study of the Historical and Social Setting of a Pauline Concept. Eugene, Oregon: Wipf & Stock.
  48. Jowett, B (Tr.). (1885). The Complete Works of Aristotle: With an Introduction, Marginal Analysis, Essays, Notes and Indices. London: Oxford University Press.
  49. Kaabwe, E. (2003). “Gender Issues in Education and Management”.in E. S. M. Kaabwe, J. Lumby & D. Middlewood (eds.), Managing Human Resources in South African Schools (pp. 201-220).London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
  50. Kater, J. (1991). Finding our Way: American Christians in Search of City of God. (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cowley Publications.
  51. Kügler, J. (2012). “Politics of Feeding: Reading John 6 (and 1 Cor 11) as Documents of Socio-Political Conflict”. in M. R. Gunda& J. Kügler, The Bible and Politics in Africa (pp. 251-273). (Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press.
  52. Kreider, Alan Worship and Evangelism in Pre-Christendom. Cambridge: Grove.
  53. Lindholm, C. (1997). “Love as an Experience of Transcendence.” In W. Jankowiak, (ed.),
  54. Romantic Passion: A Universal Experience? New York: Columbia University Press.
  55. Lucas,D. J. (2010).A History of Women in Religion: Unequal Justice.Maitland. Florida: XulonPress..
  56. Lux-Sterritt, L. & C. Sorin .(2012 ). “Introduction – Suspicious Saints: The Spiritual Paradox of the Daughters of Eve”, in L. Lux-Sterritt& C. Sorin (eds.), Spirit, Faith and Church: Women's Experiences in the English-Speaking World, 17th- 21st Centuries (pp. 1-23). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
  57. MacArthur, J. (2005). “Ephesus.” in J. MacArthur. The MacArthur Bible Commentary: Unleashing God's Truth, One Verse at a Time (pp. 1680-1707). Nashville, Tennessee: Thomas Nelson.
  58. MacDonald, M. Y. (2004). The Pauline Churches: A Socio-Historical Study of Institutionalization in the Pauline and Deutero-Pauline Writings. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
  59. MacDonald, M. Y. (2000). Colossians and Ephesians. Collegeville, Minnesota: Liturgical Press.
  60. Makama, G. A. (2013).Patriarchy and Gender Inequality in Nigeria: The Way Forward (pp.
  61. -117).in European Scientific Journal, Vol. 9, No. 17.
  62. Martin, C. J. (2015). “Womanist Interpretation of the New Testament: The Quest for Holistic and Inclusive Translation and Interpretation.” in Mitzi J Smith (ed.), I Found God in Me: A Womanist Biblical Hermeneutics Reader (pp. 17-41). Eugene, Oregon: Cascade Books.
  63. Maisiri, O. (2016). Male Headship &Female Submission in Marriage among African Christians: A Pastoral Perspective.Saarbru cken: Lap Lambert Academic Publishing.
  64. Miller-McLemore, B. J. (2012). Christian Theology in Practice: Discovering a Discipline.
  65. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.
  66. Mwaniki, L & E. Mouton. (2015). “From Patriarchy to Participatory Freedom? The Transformative Potential of the Ephesians Household Code in View of Changing Gender Roles in Kenyan Families”. In E. Moulton et al (eds.) Living with Diginity: African Perspectives on Gender Equality. Stellenbosch: Sun Press.
  67. Mwaura, P. N. (2012). “Women Lost in the Global Maze: Women and Religion in East Africa under Globalization.” In M. M. Fulkerson & S. Briggs (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theology.(pp. 250-279). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  68. Ndeda, M. A. J. (n.d.). “Nomiya Luo Church: A Gender Analysis of the Dynamics of an African Independent Church among the Luo of Siaya District in The Twentieth Century and beyond.” Retrieved from http://www.codesria.org/IMG/pdf/NDEDA-
  69. pdf, on 07.12.2018
  70. Omara, S. A. N. (2005). “New Testament Teaching on Marriage and Its Relevance for Acholi Traditional Marriage”. (School of Mission and Theology, Stavanger, Norway: Unpublished Masters Thesis.
  71. O'Reilly, B. A. (2012). Grace under Pressure: The Roles of women then and now in the Catholic Church. Bloomington, Indiana: West Bow Press.
  72. Osiek, C. & D L Balch. (1997). Families in the New Testament World: Households and House Churches. Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster John Knox Press.
  73. Padgett,A. G. (2011). As Christ Submits to the Church: A Biblical Understanding of Leadership and Mutual Submission. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker.
  74. Painter-Morland, M. (2011). “Gender, Leadership and Organization” In F. Gonzalez. Values and Ethics forthe 21st Century (pp. 441-472). Madrid: BBVA.
  75. Payne, P. B. (2015). Man and Woman, One in Christ: An Exegetical and Theological Study of Paul's Letters. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan.
  76. Phiri, I. A. (2012). “The Churh and Women in Africa.” in Elias KifonBongmba (ed.).The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to African Religions (pp. 255-268).. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  77. Pieterse, M. M. (2009). “The Role of the Parental Home, Church and Belief in the Sexual Relationships of Young Black Women.” University of South Africa (UNISA): Unpublished Masters of Theology Dissertation, 2009.
  78. Polaski, S. H. (2005). A Feminist Introduction to Paul. St. Louis, Missouri: Chalice Press.
  79. Porter, S. E. (1995). Idioms of the Greek New Testament. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic
  80. Press.
  81. Poythreas, V. S. (n.d.). “The Church as Family: Why Male Leadership in the Family Requires Male Leadership in the Church”, Retrieved from https://bible.org/seriespage/13-
  82. church-family-why-male-leadership-family-requires-male-leadership-churchon 07.06.2018.
  83. Rausch, T. P. & C. E. (2003). Clifford, Catholicism in the Third Millennium. Collegeville, Minnesota: Liturgical Press.
  84. Reynolds, P. L. (2016).How Marriage Became One of the Sacraments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  85. Ricks-Stott, H. I. (et al.). (.2017). “Theorizing Leadership Identity Development in Girlhood through Collaborative Autoethnography and Women’s knowing.” in Julia Storberg- Walker and Paige Haber-Curran (eds.), Theorizing Women and Leadership: New Insights and Contributions from Multiple Perspectives (pp. 265-289). Charlotte, North Carolina: Information Age Publishing.
  86. Ricoeur, P.(1970). Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  87. Robinson, G. D.(1995, September 27). “Paul Ricoeur and the Hermeneutics of Suspicion: A Brief Overview and Critique”. in Premise Vol. II, No. 8 Retrieved from http://www.gongfa.com/robinsonlike.htm07.06.2018.
  88. Scott-Baumann, A.(2011). Ricoeur and the Hermeneutics of Suspicion.London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  89. Seesengood, R. (2014). “Masculinity and Femininity: New Testament”. in Julia M O'Brien (ed.), The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Bible and Gender Studies. (pp. 528- 534).Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
  90. Sharrock, A. (n.d.). “Uxorius: The Praise and Blame of Husbands”. Retrieved from http://eugesta.recherche.univ-lille3.fr/revue/pdf/2013/Sharrock-3_2013.pdf, on 01.12.2018
  91. Slater, J. (2012). Christian Identity Characteristics in Paul's Letter to the Members of the Jesus Movement in Galatians: Creating Diastratic Unity in a Diastratic Divergent South African Society. (Bloomington, Indiana: AuthorHouse.
  92. Spencer, A. B., W. D. S., S. Tracy & C. Tracy. (2009).Marriage at the Crossroads: Couples in Conversation about Discipleship, Gender Roles, Decision Making and Intimacy. Downers Grove: Illinois: IVP Academics.
  93. Stewart, D.(1989). “The Hermeneutics of Suspicion.” Journal of Literature and Theology. pp.
  94. -307. Vol. 3, No. 3, November.
  95. Tamez, E.(2012). “Women’s Leadership in the New Testament.” in Elaine Wainwright, Lisa Sowle Cahill and Diego Irarrazaval (eds.) Gender in Theology, Spirituality and Practice (pp. 77-85). London: SCM Press.
  96. Topping, E. C. (nd). “Orthodox Women and Our Church.” Retrieved from http://ocl.org/ocl-
  97. publications/project-for-orthodox-renewal-2/orthodox-women-and-our-church/ on 21.11.2018
  98. Vaughan, O. (2005). Tradition and Politics: Indigenous Political Structures and Governance in Africa.Trenton, New Jersey: Africa World Press.
  99. wa Gatumu, K. (2016). “New Testament Evidence of Biblical Equity Revealed in Creation and Redemption.” in Jewel Hyun and Diphus Chemorion (eds.) Biblical Equity in Leadership: A Theology and Practice in the African Context (pp. 42-55. Eugene, Oregon: Wipf and Stock.
  100. wa Gatumu, K. (2013). “The Authentic Biblical Community: Paul’s Perspective on Ethnicity and Gender Relations Vis-à-vis the African Church.” in Sapientia Logos: A Journal of Biblical Research and Interpretation in Africa (pp. 32–76). Vol 5 (2) October.
  101. wa Gatumu, K. (2008). The Pauline Concept of Supernatural Powers: A Reading from the African Worldview.Milton Keynes: Paternoster.
  102. Wallace, D. B. (1997). Greek Grammar beyond the Basics: An Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament with Scripture, Subject, and Greek Word Indexes. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan.
  103. Wasike, A. N. (2001). “Genesis 1–2 and some Elements of Diversion from Original Meaning of Creation of Man and Woman”, in M. N. Getui, K. Holter & V. Zinkuratire (eds.), Interpreting the Old Testament in Africa pp. 175-180.Nairobi: Acton Publishers.
  104. Webb, V. (1999). Why We Are Equal: Introducing Feminist Theology,. (St. Louis, Missouri: Chalice Press.
  105. Weber, A. (n.d.). “Paul’s Household Codes: Repressive or Redemptive?.” Retrieved from http://tcapologetics.org/pauls-household-codes-repressive-or-redemptive/ on 06.03.2017.
  106. Wells, S.(2017). Introducing Christian Ethics. (Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley)
  107. Wells, C. S. (2006) “Changing the Way the Game is Played.” in M. Spierenburg&H.Wels (eds.).Culture, organization, and management in South Africa(pp. 77-108). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
  108. Westfall, C. L. (2013). “This is a Great Metaphor”! Reciprocity in the Ephesians Household Codes”, in Stanley E Porter and Andrew W Pitts (eds.), Christian Origins and Greco- Roman Culture: Social and Literary Contexts for the New Testament (pp. 561-598). Leiden: Brill.
  109. Whiston, W. (Tr). (1987). The Works of Josephus: Complete and Unabridged.Peabody, Massachusetts: Hendrickson.
  110. Wilcox,M. M. (2013). Religion in Today’s World: Global Issues, Sociological Perspectives.
  111. New Fork: Routledge.
  112. Winter, B. W. (2003). Roman Wives, Roman Widows: The Appearance of New Women and the Pauline Communities. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
  113. Wood, B. (2011). The People Paul Admired: The House Church Leaders of the New Testament.Eugene, Oregon: Wipf and Stock.
  114. Wright, D. R. (2015). The World and a Very Small Place in Africa: A History of Globalization in Niumi, The Gambia.London/New York: Routledge.
  115. Wright, J. (2012). The 'Natural Leaders' and their World Politics, Culture and Society in Belfast, c 1801-1832. (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
  116. Yonder, J. H. (1972). The Politics of Jesus. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.
  117. Yonge, C. D. (Tr.). (1987). The Works of Philo: Complete and Unabridged. Peabody, Massachusetts: Hendrickson.