Sexist Language against Female Passengers by Matatu Crew: A Case of the Kawangware-Nairobi Route 46

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Mar 28, 2025
https://doi.org/10.71064/spu.amjr.1.1.2025.330
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Special Issue - African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research (AMJR)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Ameda Wekesa
St. Paul's University

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze Sexist Language used by the Matatu crew against female passengers on the Kenyan public transport system popularly known as Matatu. Although several studies have been done on language and gender, little has been explored on the sexist language used by the Matatu crew. Sexism includes both genders in terms of discrimination, but in the real sense, women are always the most vulnerable to sexism. A language is a social tool, and a speaker may deliberately and consciously use language that reflects their attitude to their listener or reader in this case women folk. This study sought to analyze sexist language as a tool used by the matatu crew to women in Matatus plying route 46 Kawangware of Nairobi County. The study intended to achieve three objectives that focused on the words used by Matatu Crew and the response of the female gender on how it affects them psychologically and emotionally. This was achieved using Grice's theory of implicature (1975) and Speech Act Theory advanced by Austin (1962). Combining the two theories allowed the researcher to examine the implicature and indirect speech attacks to avoid misinterpretations. Speech act theory was undertaken in comprehension of public rules to produce meaningful assertion of sexist words used and why they are viewed as going against required ethical standards, in contrast Grice theory will handle the perlocutionary aspect of total speech act addressing the psychological effect of such words on the female gender. The result of the study will be used to sensitize people in general and the Matatu industry in particular to the current portrayal and its implications on female passengers in Matatus.


 

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Wekesa, A. . (2025). Sexist Language against Female Passengers by Matatu Crew: A Case of the Kawangware-Nairobi Route 46. African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research, 1(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.71064/spu.amjr.1.1.2025.330

References

  1. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Harvard University Press.
  2. Besnier, N. (2003). Crossing genders, mixing languages: The linguistic construction of transgenderism in Tonga. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 279–301). Blackwell.
  3. Citizen TV. (2021, May 21). Gangster Sacco | Unearthing rot in matatu industry [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSYzwrP2g9U
  4. Geurts, B. (2019). Communication as commitment sharing: Speech acts, implicatures, common ground. Theoretical Linguistics, 45(1–2), 1–30.
  5. Githinji, P. (2008). Sexism and misrepresentation of women in Sheng. Journal of African Cultural Studies, 20(1), 15–32.
  6. Global Urban. (2017). Taking action to empower women. Retrieved January 10, 2017, from https://www.globalurban.org
  7. Hall, K. (2005). Intertextual sexuality: Parodilas, identity, and desire in liminal Delhi. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1), 125–144.
  8. Hymes, D. H. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 35–71). Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  9. Johnstone, B., & Marcellino, W. M. (2010). Dell Hymes and the ethnography of communication. Carnegie Mellon University Research Showcase @ CMU website: http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1013&context=English
  10. Kinyatti, M. (2003). Sociolinguistic techniques and attitudes used in sexist language [Unpublished thesis]. University of Nairobi.
  11. Kombo, D. K., & Tromp, D. L. A. (2006). Proposal and thesis writing: An introduction. Pauline Publications Africa.
  12. Livia, A. (2001). Pronoun envy: Literary uses of linguistic gender. Oxford University Press.
  13. Motschenbacher, H. (2010). Language, gender, and sexual identity: Poststructuralist perspectives. John Benjamins.
  14. Manas, R. (2011). A study on ethnography of communication: A discourse analysis with Hymes’ speaking model. Journal of Education and Practice, 2(6), 1–12.
  15. Martin Luenendonk. (2019). Interview schedule: Definition, types, templates and tips [Webpage]. Cleverism.com.
  16. Mugenda, O., & Mugenda, A. (1999). Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Acts Press.
  17. Murugi, K.L. (2003). Language as a tool of abuse against women: The case study of the language of matatu touts and university students in Nairobi [Unpublished thesis]. University of Nairobi.
  18. Mutongi, K.B. (2006). Thugs or entrepreneurs? Perceptions of matatu operators in Nairobi 1970 to the present. Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute, 76, 549–568.
  19. Mwaura, A.K. (2001). Perceived service quality: The case of matatu industry [Unpublished MBA research project]. University of Nairobi.
  20. Otsola, J. (2012). Baseline survey report on gender-based violence in Kasarani, Nairobi Kenya [Report]. Women and Children’s Wellness Centre Policy.
  21. Paddison, L., & Mexico City Journal Staff Writers. (2017). Women around the world are harassed and abused on public transportation [Webpage].
  22. Rasmussen, J. (2012). Outside the law – Inside the system: Operating the matatu sector in Nairobi. Urban Forum, 23(4), 415–433.
  23. Sapir, E. (1956). Communication in encyclopaedia of the social sciences (Vol. 78–81). Macmillan.
  24. Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson R.B. (2017). How to construct a mixed methods research design.Kolner Z Soz Sozpsychol, 69(Suppl 2), 107–131.
  25. Sommers M., & Environment Development Staff Writers.(2010): Urban Youth in Africa,” Environment Development