Conspiracy Theories, Community Radio, and Uptake of COVID-19 Preventive Behaviors in Kenya. A Case of SIFA FM

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jan 30, 2024
https://doi.org/10.71064/spu.amjr.8.II.2023.252
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 8 No. II (2023): African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Gladys Muasya
St. Paul's University
wanjugu Wachira
St. Paul's University
Susan Mwangi
St. Paul's University

Abstract

The onset of COVID-19 in December 2019 in Wuhan China ushered in a new normal in the way the society handled its issues.  However, measures were put to contain it. This pandemic unlike others was surrounded by lots of conspiracy theories regarding its origin, purpose, and measures put in place to contain it. The purpose of this study was to show how conspiracy theories and radio communication influenced the uptake of COVID-19 preventive measures in two SIFA FM station audiences, Voi and Marsabit.   A sample of 200 participants filled out a survey with closed and open-ended questions in July to October 2021. The results showed that marital status and the location of the participant influenced the perception of susceptibility and uptake of COVID-19 preventive measures. The audience had great faith in the radio and listened to it often. Generally, there was a high perception of the intake of COVID-19 preventive measures, and low perception of participants’ susceptibility to the COVID-19 pandemic, and a moderate perception of conspiracy beliefs. Half of the participants were willing to take up vaccines but a good number were still doubtful of vaccines.   Thus, the radio should tailor intervention messages based on the risk perception of different groups in its audience.  In addition, different conspiracy theories circulated in different locations, and the two cultures had different perception levels of their risk to the pandemic

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Muasya, G. ., Wachira, wanjugu, & Mwangi, S. . (2024). Conspiracy Theories, Community Radio, and Uptake of COVID-19 Preventive Behaviors in Kenya. A Case of SIFA FM . African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research, 8(II), 172–196. https://doi.org/10.71064/spu.amjr.8.II.2023.252

References

  1. Ahmed W., Vidal-Alaball J., Downing J., Seguí F. L. (2020). COVID-19 and the 5G conspiracy theory: Social network analysis of Twitter data. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(5), e19458.
  2. Allington, D., Duffy, B., Wessely, S., Dhavan, N., & Rubin, J. (2020). Health-protective behaviour, social media usage, and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Psychological Medicine, 1-7.
  3. Bangalee, A., & Bangalee, V. (2021). Fake news and fallacies: Exploring vaccine hesitancy in South Africa. South African Family Practice, 63(4).
  4. Bavel, J. J. V., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., ... & Willer, R. (2020). Using social and behavioral science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 460-471.
  5. Bierwiaczonek, K., Kunst, J. R., & Pich, O. (2020). Belief in COVID‐19 conspiracy theories reduces social distancing over time. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 12(4), 1270-1285.
  6. Borges, J., & Byrne, M. (2022). Investigating COVID-19 risk perception and preventive behaviours in third-level students in Ireland. Acta Psychological, 224, 103535.
  7. Bruns A., Harrington S., Hurcombe E. (2020). “Corona? 5G? Or both?” The dynamics of COVID-19/5G conspiracy theories on Facebook. Media International Australia, 177(1), 12–29.
  8. Bwire, G. M. (2020). Coronavirus: why men are more vulnerable to Covid-19 than women? SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine, 2(7), 874-876.
  9. Chamegere, E. (2021). Misinformation and conspiracy theories on Covid-19 pandemic: the Kenyan perspective. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR).
  10. Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 40, 3-35.
  11. Douglas, K. M. (2021). COVID-19 conspiracy theories. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(2), 270-275.
  12. Enders, A. M., Uscinski, J., Klofstad, C., & Stoler, J. (2022). On the relationship between conspiracy theory beliefs, misinformation, and vaccine hesitancy. Plos one, 17(10), e0276082.
  13. Gagliardone, I., Diepeveen, S., Findlay, K., Olaniran, S., Pohjonen, M., & Tallam, E. (2021). Demystifying the COVID-19 infodemic: Conspiracies, context, and the agency of users. Social Media+ Society, 7(3), 20563051211044233.
  14. Havey N. F. (2020). Partisan public health: How does political ideology influence support for COVID-19 related misinformation? Journal of Computational Social Science, 3(2), 319– 342.
  15. Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley (content analysis).
  16. Hornik, R., Kikut, A., Jesch, E., Woko, C., Siegel, L., & Kim, K. (2020). Association of COVID-
  17. Misinformation with Face Mask Wearing and Social Distancing in a Nationally Representative US Sample. Health Communication, 36(1), 6-14.
  18. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
  19. Okoth, D. O. (June, 2020). Radio and pandemics: Covid-19 I East Africa: How community and vernacular radio is influencing social and behaviour change. KAS Media Africa. https//www.kas.de/documents/285576/285625/Radio+and+pandemic+-+COVID- 19in+East+Africa.pdf
  20. Pandit, M., & Kandpal, L. (2020). Radio as a tool for creating awareness during COVID-
  21. Dogo Rangsang Research Journal, 10(6). Retrieved from http://www.drsrjournal.com/no_4_june_20/18.pdf
  22. Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Understanding descriptive research designs and methods. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 34(1), 8-12.
  23. SIFA FM. (n.d.) About SIFA FM. http://www.sifafm.co.ke/
  24. World health Organization. (n.d). Advice for the public: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Accessed on May 31, 2022. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel- coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public
  25. Skowronek, D., & Duerr, L. (2009). The convenience of nonprobability: Survey strategies for small academic libraries. College & Research Libraries News, 70(7), 412-415.
  26. Soares, P., Rocha, J. V., Moniz, M., Gama, A., Laires, P. A., Pedro, A. R., ... & Nunes, C. (2021). Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Vaccines, 9(3), 300.
  27. Uscinski, J.E., & Enders, A.M. (2020, 30 April). The Coronavirus conspiracy boom. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/04/what-can- coronavirus-te ll-us-about-conspiracy-theories/610894/
  28. Van, Baven. J. J., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Valerio, C., Aleksandra, C., Mina, C., ... & Robb,
  29. W. (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 460-471.
  30. Van Prooijen, J. W., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). Belief in conspiracy theories: Basic principles of an emerging research domain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(7), 897-908.
  31. Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 767–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611434786
  32. World Health Organization. (n.d.). Advice for the public: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19).
  33. Accessed on May 31, 2022.
  34. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel- coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public