Association between Hotel Employees’ Sociodemographic Characteristics and Employee Place Identity: Preliminary Findings from Nakuru Town, Kenya

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Apr 20, 2022
https://doi.org/10.71064/spu.amjr.1.1.126
Download
pdf
Statistic
2022: Special Issue:African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Mary Karemeri
St. Paul's University
Daniel M. Nzengya
St. Paul's University

Abstract

Over the last few years, there have been concerns about rapid urbanization caused by the proliferation of hotels, which in turn poses a huge threat on sustainability in the hospitality industry. Urban planners postulate that hotel employees’ sense of place is critical to the sustainability of hotels, with implications on the overall urban sustainability; however, there is paucity of research that has investigated this phenomenon amongst hotel employees in Kenya, especially in Nakuru County. This research paper informed by place identity theory, presents preliminary findings on sociodemographic characteristics associated with employee place identity in selected hotels in Nakuru town. The study used cross-sectional survey to collect data from 16 hotel employees. Data were collected using a questionnaire with closed ended questions. Place identity was operationalized using validated urban-related Identity measures. Place identify is a multidimensional construct which comprises employee's external evaluation, general attachment, continuity with personal past, perception of familiarity, and commitment. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data from the sample. Association between sociodemographic characteristics associated with employee place identity were assessed using Chi-Square tests. An independent T-Test was conducted to examine statistically significant differences on employee place identity by gender. The mean for males was 3.17 (SD = 0.73), while the mean for females was 3.50 (SD = 0.56). Although females had a higher value for place identity compared to males, the differences were not statistically significant (t = -.98, p = 0.14). The mean for employees aged 30 years and below was 2.80 (SD = .64), while the mean for employees aged 31 years or older were 3.50 (SD = 0.58). Differences in employee place identify by age were statistically significant t = -2.25, p = 0.04). Differences in employee place identify by highest level education attained were statistically significant, t = -3.01, p = 0.01). These findings have implications that employers who recognize employees who have attained higher education level, contribute positively towards their demonstration of greater stewardship towards environmental conservation.
Keywords: Sustainable development; sustainable hospitality, hotels, place identity; Nakuru town, Kenya

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Karemeri, M., & Nzengya, D. M. (2022). Association between Hotel Employees’ Sociodemographic Characteristics and Employee Place Identity: Preliminary Findings from Nakuru Town, Kenya. African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research, 1(1), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.71064/spu.amjr.1.1.126

References

  1. Abdou, A. H., Hassan, T. H., & Dief, M. M. (2020). A Description of Green Hotel Practices and Their Role in Achieving Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 12(9624), 1– 20.
  2. Anton, C. E., & Lawrence, C. (2014). Home is where the heart is: The effect of place of residence on place attachment and community participation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40(2014), 451–461.
  3. Belanche, D., Casaló, A. L., & Rubio, M. (2021). Local place identity: A comparison between residents of rural and urban communities. Journal of Rural Studies, 82(1), 242–252.
  4. Bernardo, F., & Palma-Oliveira, J. (2013). Place identity, place attachment and the scale of place: The impact of place salience. PsyEcology, 4(2), 167–193.
  5. Hallak, R., Assaker, G., & Lee, C. (2015). Tourism Entrepreneurship Performance: The Effects of Place Identity, Self-Efficacy, and Gender. Journal of Travel Research, 54(1), 36–51.
  6. Hansen, C. D. (2014). Gender differences in place attachment and residential mobility. 19.
  7. Jamaludin, M., & Yusof, Z. B. (2013). Best Practice of Green Island Resorts. Procedia-
  8. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 105(2013), 20–29.
  9. Katsamagka, A. (2013). Developing Place Attachment to the Natural Surroundings of the School: The Role of Outdoor Education [Master’s Thesis]. Linkoping University.
  10. Kuo, H. M., Su, J. Y., Wang, C. H., Kiatsakared, P., & Chen, K. Y. (2021). Place Attachment and Environmentally Responsible Behavior: The Mediating Role of Destination Psychological Ownership. Sustainability, 13(6809), 1–16.
  11. Murimi, M. (2020). Determinants of Green Management Practices in Hotels in Kisumu City, Kenya- A Theoretical Framework. Journal of Strategic Management, 5(1), 47–63.
  12. Parsa, R. M., & Torabi, Z. (2015). Explaining the Concept of Identity and Sense of Place in Residential Environment and Lifestyle. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 4(5), 27–43.
  13. Qazimi, S. (2014). Sense of Place and Place Identity. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 1(1), 306–311.
  14. Robert, N., & Rosaline, C. (2018). From sense of place to visualization of place: Examining people-place relationships for insight on developing geovisualizations | Elsevier Enhanced Reader. Heliyon, 4(2018), 1–37.
  15. Rollero, C., & De Piccoli, N. (2010). Place Attachment, Identification and Environment Perception: An Empirical Study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2010), 198–205.
  16. Schmitt, B. (2004). Visual Identity and Experience Dimensions in the International Luxury Hotel Industry. Columbia Business School.
  17. Tournois, L., & Rollero, C. (2020). “Should I stay or should I go?” Exploring the influence of individual factors on attachment, identity and commitment in a post-socialist city. Cities, 102(102740), 1–40.